| |
FIELD & FUNDUS
DR. REZAUL MURSHED
M.B.B.S(DMC)D.O(D.U)
AHMAD MEDICAL CENTER
DHAKA BANGLADESH
Fax: 00-88-02-8117364
E-mail: amc@bol-online.com
|
HISTORY
-
450 BC: HIPPOCRATES describe HEMIANOPIA
-
150 BC: Ptolemy estimating the outer limits of the Visual field
-
1668: EDME MARIOTTE discover blind spot.
-
1856: Clinically campimetry first started by Graefe.
-
1851-1920: Prof.J.P.Bejerrum of Copenhagen devised Tangent screen. He drew his first screen on the back of his door. He also first described Arcuate scotoma, Bjerrum/Tangent screen was popular in USA for 100 years.
-
1869: Forster and Aubert developed an arc perimeter. It was very popular and became known as Forster perimeter.
-
1945: First Cupola perimetry was designed by Professor. Hans Goldman, Bern.
-
First Automated Static perimetry also came out from
Switzerland, Bern.
-
First Automated Octopus 201 in late 1970 room size costing excess of US $ 100000 for unknown technology. And high cost kept perimetry in “IVORY TOWER”.
- 1982: First Humphrey field analyzer was displayed at “AAO”
- 1983: Production unit delivery began. Because of small size & low cost the machine became very popular
|
|
Key Issue
Understanding the Principles
HUMPHREY IS GOLD STANDARD
GOOD THINGS ARE CHEAP BUT CHEAP THINGS ARE NOT GOOD
|
|
|
STATIC vs KINETIC
|
STATIC
- Quantitative
- VFD detected earlier
than kinetic, with 20% nerve damage
- Area is fixed but
Stimulus varies in intensity
- Three dimensional
- Computerized
- Threshold type
- Less Error
- Quality & Expensive
- Good both for Glaucoma
& Neurological
|
KINETIC
- Qualitative YES/NO
- VFD when 40%
nerve damage
-
Fixed stimulus seen
from seeing to non
seeing, area is not fixed.
- Two dimensional
- Not Computerized
- Non Threshold
- Man behind Perimeter
- Not used so much
- Good for Neurological
|
|
|
WHAT IS PERIMETRY
Is the measurement of the differential light
Sensitivity of the retina at a defined number of
Locations.

|
HOW TO INTERPRET THE HUMPHREY FIELD FOR GLAUCOMA & NEUROLOGICAL CASES
|
WHEN WILL YOU SEND A PATIENT FOR FIELD?
- ELEVATED IOP
- SUSPECTED OPTIC NERVE
- ASYMMETRIC CUP:DISC > 0 .3
- IOP DIFFERS 3mmHg FROM OTHER EYE
- UNEXPLAINED LOW VISUAL ACUITY
- UNEXPLAINED HEADACHE
- GLAUCOMA IN OTHER EYE
- PREVIOUS RETINAL DETACHMENT
- H/O OCULAR TRAUMA
|
SUSPECTED OR ESTABLISHED GLAUCOMA
- OPTIC NERVE HEAD CHANGE OR NERVE FIBER LAYER DEFECT
- VISUAL FIELD DEFECT
- RAISED INTRAOCULAR PRESSURE
WHEN ONE OF THE THREE IS SEEN THEN
GLAUCOMA IS SUSPECTED.
WHEN ANY OF THE TWO ARE SEEN THEN GLAUCOMA IS ESTABLISHED.
|
GLAUCOMA SUSPECT BY THE EUROPEAN GLAUCOMA SOCIETY
|
OCULAR HYPER TENSION
- Peak IOP >21mmHg, on a diurnal day curve.
- No Visual field defect
- No optic nerve head change or Nerve fiber layer defect (NFLD).
AAO Vol. 109,Number 3,March 2002
|
|
|
NORMAL GROUP
- INTRA OCULAR PRESSURE <21 mmHg
- NO VISUAL FIELD CHANGE
- NO OPTIC NERVE HEAD OR RETINAL NERVE FIBER LAYER CHANGES SUGGESTIVE OF GLAUCOMA
- NO INTRA- OCULAR DISEASE OR INTRA OCULAR SURGERY
- NO H/O HYPERTENSION, DIABETES.
- NO FAMILY HISTROY OF GLAUCOMA.
AAO VOLUME 109,NUMBER 3,MARCH 2002
|
|
The Eye Care America Glaucoma Project
Is your patient or their family at Risk for
Glaucoma? Score below to see.
| 1.Family History (Chose one) |
No F/H |
0 |
| Parent & Child has glaucoma |
2 |
| Siblings |
4 |
| Parents & Siblings |
4 |
| 2.Race(Chose one) |
Caucasian |
0 |
| Hispanic |
1 |
| Black |
3 |
| 3.Age(Chose one) |
<40 |
0 |
| 39-49 |
1 |
| 49-59 |
2 |
| 59+ |
4 |
To Score: Add one score in each of the above categories. If you have a
total score 4 or higher, you have a high risk for having Glaucoma.
|
|
GREATER RISK OF GLAUCOMA
- OLDER THAN 45 YEARS
- A FAMILY HISTROY OF GLAUCOMA
- HIGH INTRAOCULAR PRESSURE
- DIABETES
- MYOPIA
- USED STEROIDS FOR LONG TIME
- HAD A PREVIOUS EYE INJURY
|
Risk Factors
Now CCT
- Family History
- Older Age
- Race
|
THRESHOLD
THRESHOLD IS THE CRUCIAL CONCEPT IN PERIMETRY
Threshold is the dimmest stimulus seen by the a subject,50% of the
time. Measured in decibels(dB) in automated perimetry. Higher the
dB minimum is the light, lower the dB (0dB) brightest is the light.
0dB=Brightest light
40dB=Dimmest light
|

|
|
The Threshold of Sensitivity
The threshold is the crucial concept in perimetry. The threshold is the dimmest
Light seen by a subject, 50% of the time.
|
NORMAL THRESHOLD VALUES
First four paracentral points are 3 º
from vertical & horizontal lines,12.7 º from the fixation point & next all stimulus points are 6 degree apart.
Maximum threshold is at the fovea say,35dB dimmest light,
with each degree to periphery threshold decreases by .03 dB.

|
STRATEGY/METHOD/TECHNIQUE HUMPHREY HAS MANY OPTIONS
| FULL THRESHOLD |
1983 |
Normal 12-20 Min |
| FASTPAC |
1991 |
Normal 10-15 Min |
| SITA |
1997 |
|
SITA STANDARD= FULL THRESHOLD Normal 5-8 Min
SITA FAST= FASTPAC Normal 3-5 Min
- Printout
- Single field analysis
- Over view
STRATEGIES ARE
| FULL THRESHOLD |
1983
|
20-30 Min |
| FASTPAC
|
1991 |
14-20 Min |
| SITA |
1997
|
|
Swedish Interactive
Threshold Algorithm
5-8 Min
|
|
|
|
SITA
-
SWEDISH INTERACTIVE THRESHOLD ALGORITHM
-
From MALMO UNIVERSITY OF SWEDEN 1997
-
Developed by Anders Heijl & Boel Bengtsson and group over 10yrs period.
-
New test Algorithm (a set of rules or procedures that must be followed in solving a particular problem)
-
Beginning of test estimates based on normative data.
-
Testing based on a model of “estimates” of normal and glaucomatous fields.
-
SITA knows when to quit, it computes when to stop at each test location. SITA compares with a Senior Professor. Spends more time when unsure of the result and spends less time when with consistent result.
-
SITA is time saving but results are equivalent to FULL THRESHOLD(SS) or FASTPAC(SF). Calculations are done after the test, so there is less fatigue for the patient.
-
There are two types of SITA STANDATD(SS) or SITA FAST(SF) like, TOP (Tendency oriented perimetry of OCTOPUS)
|
|
SITA STANDARD 24-2
- IS
- SIMPLE
- SHORT
- SUPER
- SOUND
- SOLID
- SCIENTIFIC
- SINGLE FIELD ANALYSIS
- SMART
- SENIOR PROFESSOR
- BOTH FOR GLAUCOMA & NEUROLOGY
- USED ALL MOST ALL OVER THE WORLD
|
|
SO USING FASTER STRATEGIES
Reduce the fatigue effect caused by both
- Retinal fatigue
- Physical fatigue
Therefore a quicker test can be more
reliable and accurate compare to testing
with longer elaborate test strategies.
|
|
Types of Glaucomatous field loss
- First field loss was described by Albrecht von Graefe in 1856
- A decade later, he demonstrated preservation of the temporal and central regions in advanced glaucoma.
- Later,Bjerrum(1889) & Ronne(1909) demonstrated the presence of arcuate field defects, and nasal steps.
- The very large study by Aulhorn and Harms in 1967 demonstrated the importance of paracentral defects as an early sign of glaucoma.
|
|
Aulhorn's & Harms' classification of glaucomatous field loss
- Isolated paracentral scotomas
- Bjerrum's scotoma
- Bjerrum's scotoma breaking through to the periphery
- Central or temporal island
- Blindness
|
|
THE KEY PATTERN DEVIATION PLOT CHART

Scotomas are seen in the Suspected & Expected zones
|
LOOK ONLY LOWER RIGHT DEVIATION PLOT CHART

|
SINGLE FIELD ANALYSIS

|
|
SINGLE FIELD ANALYSIS
|
-
Name,ID ,DOB,R/L, pupil size& age. Next is SIX IN ONE
-
Upper left Parameters, Stimulus size, back ground 31.5 dB, Catch trial
Pupil dia, V.A. Near Correction, Date, Time, Age
-
Upper right GRAY SCALE
-
Upper left next to Gray scale is NUMERIC DATA, this
is the raw data printed in numbers that express the patient's response in dB.
-
A. This segment is expressed numerically and probability
Plots (5B) of abnormality demonstrates how the patient's
responses deviated from known normal patients of their
age. Middle left (5A) aged matched Numeric data.
lower left aged matched probability plot (5B)
-
A.PATTERN DEVIATION : This is the KEY PLOT.
The pattern deviation fine tune and enhance the total
deviation data. It corrects total deviation from any media
opacity (cataract), miotic pupil. It also displayed as both
a numeric (6A) difference and with probability analysis
Plots(6B).Any real localized defect is seen in this plot.
Middle right Numeric data & Lower right( 6B ) probability
Plot chart (Actual picture of the patient)
|
|
|
EVALUTING OF A SINGLE FIEL
| |
1. General information
2. Reliability indices
3 &4. Raw data and gray scale
5. A & B Total deviation
6. A & B Pattern deviation
7. Global Indices (MD & PSD)
8. Glaucoma Hemifield test (GHT)
9. Gaze Tracking
|

|
| |
If you can correlate
the disc with Pattern
Deviation Probability
Plot
THAT'S ALL.
HERE
CUP V>H Thin sup
NRR gives inf. arcuate
Scotoms which later
joins the inf nasal step.
Here superior nasal
step is also seen. An
established case of
early POAG. She had
strong F/H & raised
IOP.
|
|
KEY POINTS
-
Combined evaluation of Optic disc & Visual field
-
The defect should be reproducible, in particular peripheral defects in the first visual field should be confirmed before accepted.
-
The shape of the field defect should correspond to retinal nerve fiber anatomy.
-
The defect should correspond to changes at the optic disc.
-
Diffuse loss is more likely to be due to cataract or more miotic therapy in glaucoma.
|
PATTERN DEVIATION PLOT CHART
IF YOU CAN ONLY READ THE PATTERN DEVIATION PROBABILITY PLOT CHART 6B THATS ALL.
OF COURSE IT MUST CORRELATES WITH THE DISC
|
|

Time : If it exceeds its normal then it's
likely to be a Path. VF
SS 5-8 Min SF 3-5 Min
|
UPPER LEFT
Fixation Monitor/Gaze Blind Spot: On the upper
left side of the printout. Patient's eye is
monitored by fixing the eye towards a yellow
light. At the beginning of the test after fixation
5% of the supra threshold a type of stimulus
is given on the B.S. to find out central fixation.
This is called HEIJL-KRAKOW method. Here
fixation target is central. If there is any macular
pathology instead of central fixation we choose
small diamond or large diamond just below the
central fixation. (See Slide 31).
FL is a tricky thing. It should be within 20%,but it
will be a reliable VF with high FL, but low FP & FN.
FP TRIGGER HAPPY it should be below 10%.It
means that the pt. pressed the switch without seeing the
light.
FN First a low intensity light is seen. At the same point
a brighter stimulation (more than 9dB) is given to see if
Pt. is alert or not. Its normal value is 15%but in Path.
Condition it goes up above normal level.
|
|
INSIDE HUMPHREY PERIMETER

A lesion in the retina is twenty times magnified in the bowl
Optic nerve is 1.5mmx20=30mm which seen in reduced form.
|
RELIABILITY PARAMETERS
| UPPER LEFT SIDE
|
Normal
|
| FIXATION LOSS
|
20%
|
| FALSE POITIVE
|
10%
|
| FALSE NEGATIVE
|
15%
|
FOVEAL THRESH HOLD
20 yrs. 35 dB
30 yrs. 34 dB
70 yrs. 30 dB
FT decrease 1 dB per 10 yrs.
|
If FT measures above 30 dB
V.A. will be above 6/12
0 dB=Brightest light in moon
Lit night
40 dB= dimmest light
|
Octopus Decibels HUMPHREY
|
40 |
50 |
30 |
40 |
0 |
10 |
FP=It is better to omit than to commit
|
|
|
UPPER RIGHT GRAY SCALE
This is a “HOLISTIC” overview on the displays the patient's responses in various shades of grey instead of printing numeric data. It is of little clinical value. In octopus it is colored. From gray scale it is hard to pick out THE WHEAT from Chaff.
SEARCHING FOR A
NEEDLE IN HAY
STACK
|
|
A GLANCE GUESS FROM GRAY SCALE
|
|
|
|
|
|
Typical clover leaf pattern
FN 42% (Unreliable field).
Think of other peripheral
Constricted field. |
|
Young lady of 30yrs.
V.A.6/6, F.L 29%, FP
25% & FN 59%. GHT
O.N.L .A case of
MALINGERING. Both
Fundus ARE NAD.
|
|
This 56 yrs. middle aged lady whose rt. eye vision is 6/9 FT 32 dB. Only a small nasal NRR persists which represents a small central vision with a small temporal island of vision remains, all other parameters are excellent.
|
|
ONLY GROSS DEFECT
This young lady of 23 is an established case of RP. Her both discs are pale
with jet black spots in the peripheral retina, parents were cousins, sister and
brother, H/O night blindness,V.A.6/6 with very good FT 37 dB,
D/D 1.R.P 2.lens rim defect 3.Retinoschisis 4.Pan retinal photo coag
5Peripheral retinal degeneration 6C.R.O ..7.Aphakic glass. |
|
|
A screening test of the same RP case. Two zones with central and peripheral ref. were 34dB.Out
of 120 points pt. sees only 59 points R/E & 40 points in L/E.It's a suprathreshold type of test.
A threshold test should be performed when a pt. cannot see 10 points out of 120 points or at
any area 2 or 3 adjacent points of non seen points are detected.
|
SCREENING PROGRAMS HFA II
|
SCREENING FOR GLAUCOMA MAJOR POINTS
- No single good screening tool for Glaucoma exist.
- Tonometry suffers from a poor balance between sensitivity and specificity.
- Optic nerve head examination requires skilled observers and does not have a defined end point.
- Perimetry is expensive, and has a learning curve.
|
|
NAME DOB ID
|
V.A 6/6 B/E
IOP Normal
C;D
Rt. .4
Lt. .6
Plan
Repeat VF
|
|
By mistake her DOB was given 1969, instead of 1959.Gray scale shows slight
Deep GHT GRS. But when her exact DOB is given 1959,GHT is WNL. So,
always give Correct DOB as well as last corrected distance vision.
BUT THIS IS A HIGHLY SUSPECTED FIELD.
|
|
PUPIL SIZE 3 TO 7 mm
|
One EYED
established
POAG ON
Anti
Glaucoma
Drug
First field
done 2.1
2 nd VF 3.9
mm pupil
|
|
|
All fields should be done with normal reacting pupil within 3-7 mm in size. Dilated pupil
gives less false result than the small pupil. So, please check pupil size before seeing a Visual field (VF) Humprey's latest version 12.3 will give you the pupil size on the screen before starting the field.
|
|
PUPIL SIZE
-
AREA OF CIRCLE = x r2
-
2mm Pupil Area=3.14 x 1 mm2=1 mm2
-
8mm Pupil Area=3.14 x 4 mm2=16 mm2
- SO,IF YOU SHIFT PUPIL FROM 2mm TO 8mm, YOU WILL GET AN INCREASE OF 16 FOLD AREA OF THE PUPIL SIZE
-
SO,WIDE VARIATION OF THE PUPIL SIZE WILL GIVE YOU A FALSE VISUAL FIELD DEFECT, SO PUPIL SIZE SHOULD BE BETWEEN 3 mm TO 7 mm AND IT SHOULD REACT TO LIGHT ON PUPIL .
|
|
GHT & PROBABILITY
 |
<5% = Significant
<0.5% = More Sig.
IN THE
LOWER
MIDDLE
|

|
GHT- This test assumes that glaucoma does not cause a generalized
Global depression of the field of vision. It takes advantage of the
asymmetric field loss pattern generally seen in glaucoma. The test
analyses defects in the superior hemi field and makes comparison
with mirror image locations in the inferior hemi field.
- GHT may be OUT SIDE NORMAL LIMIT (ONL)
- BORDER LINE (BL)
- GENERAL REDUCTION OF SENSITIVITY (GRS)
- ABNORMALLY HIGH SENSITIVITY
- WITH IN NORMAL LIMIT (w.N.L)
|
|
GHT
The GHT has been evaluated by both Peter Åsman and Heijl(1992) and by Katz(1996). IT WILL GIVE YOU FIVE RESULTS.
-
Abnormally high sensitivity. The general height of the field is beyond the 99.5% limit for normal.
- Out side normal limits (ONL) - The asymmetry is beyond the 99% limit for normal in any of sector pairs. If seen twice in two consecutive fields early glaucomatous defect criteria by “Anderson”.
- Borderline (BL) - The asymmetry is beyond the 97% limit for normal in sector pairs. It's not a pathological field.
- General reduction in sensitivity (GRS) - The general height is below the 0.5% limit for normal. Seen in Cataract, High Myopia, Media opacity, Dilated pupil.
- Within normal limits (WNL) - When none of the above four criteria are seen.
|
GAZE TRACKER
By seeing this tracing at lower end of the
field you can judge whether the fixation is
OK or not.
|
|
|
SEEN JUST BELOW THE GRAY SCALE
GLOBAL INDICES MD (Mean deviation)
Or mean defect- The mean deviation is the
average difference between the patient's
overall sensitivity and that of age matched
controls. High MD seen in case of Normal:
- Cataract
- Miosis
- Ref.error
- Fatigue
Then PSD will be normal. |
AT THE BOTTOM OF THE FIELD |
PSD: Is an index of unevenness in amount
of field calculated from Pattern deviation
Plot chart. (Normal up to 2.5)
|
|
|
INTERPRETATION CRITERIA
INTERPRETATION CRITERIA
- THE REASON FOR DOING FIELD.
- CORRECT DATA AND RELIABLE FIELD.
- PUPIL SIZE
n PATIENT'S PERFORMANCE
- READ CHART WITH OTHER FINDINGS
- DIAGNOSE THE CASE, IF IN DOUBT REPEAT THE SAME TEST BUT NOT THE SAME DAY
- INTERPRETATION OF A FIELD IS NOT A CHILD'S PLAY
|
|
AN EARLY FIELD DEFECT ACCORDING TO “ANDERSON ”
Cluster of 3 or more adjacent points in an expected, suspected location (Typical for glaucoma) of central 24 degree field. ON AT LEAST TWO CONSECUTIVE FIELDS
OR
Glaucoma Hemi field test (GHT) Outside normal for at least two consecutive Fields
OR
|
Cycling can't be learned in a day

|
|
LEARNING CURVE
First field is not always a
reliable field (of course not
all the time). She is a young
school teacher. First VF done after seeing her IOP R30 &17 L. healthy NRR .6 & .5 are the cup : disc ratio R/L respectively. Since 5 th June '00 she was on anti- Glaucoma drug. We
stopped her drops after
Seeing the 2 nd field .On the
3 rd field on 29 th Oct '01 her
VF is within Normal limit & IOP too. It's a long term fluctuation.
|
FOLLOW UP

PATIENT IS WITH BETA BLOCKER DROP SCINCE SEPTEMBER 2001
|
First field is not always reliable
Field done out side
BANGLADESH |
|
This young girl of
10yrs.has been dig. in
Marfan Sy with
NTG.It can not occur
before 45yrs.Diag.
Out side BD.In Dhaka
It has been dig. Marfan
Without Glaucoma
her first field is not
reliable. Second field
done at Dhaka is OK
GHT ONL is due to
high myopic cylinder.
Doing field is like a
Baby sitter. Glaucoma
may be associated with
sublaxation of the lens.
Here her IOP is normal
Her both NRR are healthy.
I LOVE MY COUNTRY
|
|
BEFORE SENDING THE PATIENT
- GIVE LAST CORRECTED DISTANCE VISION
- DETAIL OF OPTIC NERVE EXAMINATION IF POSSIBLE WITH DIAGRAM
- INTRA OCULAR PRESSURE (IOP)
FLEXIBILITY IS THE ENEMY OF STANDARDIZATION
 |
A LABORIOUS THRESHOLD TEST HIGH RESOLUTION PATTERN MAY FERRET OUT EARLY SIGNS OF GLAUCOMA.BUT IT MAY ALSO GENERATE ARTIFACTS, IF THE PATIENT'S ENDURANCE IS STRESSED BEYOND 20 MINUTES PER EYE “LEADERSHIP IS LIKE SWIMMING CANNOT BE LEARNED IN A “DAY” OFTEN TO GET A RELIABLE FIELD YOU HAVE TO DO ONE FIELD EACH MONTH FOR THREE CONSECUTIVE MONTHS OF COURSE NOT ALL THE TIME.
PLEASE TELL YOUR PATIENT THAT IT IS
A TIME CONSUMING TEST.TELL HIM OR HER TO TRY TO COME IN THE MORNING. IT'S A PSYCOPHYSICAL
TEST.TELL THEM NOT TO BE IN HURRY.HE OR SHE MAY MISS THE BUS, WITH AN UNRELIABLE FIELD.
|
|
It will be like a game, very easy to do !!
|
 |
|
|
COMMON PROBLEMS WITH PERIMETRY
- LEARNING / FATIGUE EFFECTS
- PUPIL SIZE
- REFRACTIVE ERROR
- ARTIFACTS
- PATIENT COOPERATION
|
|
PHYSIOLOGICAL FUNDUS
|

She is a young lady of 27yrs.
old. Her IOP are normal. But
big C;D .65 B/E, her Doctor
put her anti Glaucoma drop.
But her fundus NRR is healthy
& ISNT rule is ok. Her two
consecutive fields are normal
as well her B/Y field are O.K
It's a normal
PHYSIOLOGICAL DISC
|
|
|

BACK
GROUND
IS YELLOW
& THE V
IS THE BLUE
STIMULUS
SIZE
|
|
| |
- HIGH INTER-INDIVIDUAL VARIABILITY
- LENS ABSORPTION
- PATIENT FATIGUE
- LONG ADAPTION TIME
- UNPLEASANT
- ONLY PATIENT UNDER 40YEARS !?
|
DRAW
BACKS B/Y
|
|
|

This young man of 34yrs a typist came for red eyes. V.A. 6/6 B/E and IOP !7 mmhg. Both Funds showed ISNT rule are OK.Fields are normal too. It's nothing but a normal physiological cup.still than he should be on follow up.
ALWAYS CORRELATES WITH THE FUNDUS
|
GLAUCOMA
|
|
NORMAL TENSION GLAUCOMA
A CONDITION IN WHICH GLAUCOMATOUS CUPPING OF OPTIC NERVE HEAD, LOSS OF NERVE FIBER LAYER AND VISUAL FIELD LOSS OCCURS AT AN IOP BELOW <21mmHg MEASURED AT DIFFERENT TIMES, WITH OPEN AND NORMAL APPEARING ANGLE .
VARIENTS OF NTG
- NON-PROGRESSIVE FORM
- PROGRESSIVE
FORM
OPTIC NERVE HEAD CHANGES IN NTG
- Large cupping disproportionate to field loss
- Sloping edges
- Thinning of NRR especially inferiorly & Inf.temp
- Hourglass pattern of lamina cribrosa
- High incidence of acquired pit of the Optic head
- Greater frequency & extent of Peripaillary atrophy
- Higher incidence of splinter hemorrhage of OND
- More localized nerve fiber layer defect
VISUAL FIELD DEFECT
- Localized, deep, steep defects
- Close to fixation
OTHER ASSOCIATES OF NTG
- NTG usually seen in elderly F>M 6:1
- More common in ASIANS
- F/H ,Myopia, Systemic hypotension, hypertension, Postural hypotension, Nocturnal hypotension, Cardiovascular disease, Migraine, Raynaud's , Acute blood loss, Hypovolemia following severe vomiting & diarrhea
Differential Diagnosis of NTG
- POAG with a wide diurnal fluctuations
- Pigmentary glaucoma
- Intermittent IOP elevation as in, glaucomatocyclitic crisis and intermittent angle closure
- Previous episode of IOP elevation: Steroid induced Glaucoma
- Non-Glaucomatous optic nerve disease like ischemic optic neuropathy, Congenital optic disc pit, compressive lesions of optic nerve etc.
|
|
DIAGNOSIS of NTG
OCULAR EVALUTION ;
Apart from routine ocular & FUNDUS examination.
LOOK FOR
- Central corneal thickness(520 µM) , thin cornea may give false low IOP reading,
POAG might appear as NTG
- Record of a diurnal curve
- Perimetry
- HRT
- Record of ocular blood flow
MEDICAL EVALUTION
- Cardiovascular examination including 24 hrs. BP monitoring to rule out nocturnal hypotension, Carotid artery Doppler imaging to assess blood flow, capillary filling time on exposure to cold.
- Complete blood picture, ESR, Blood profile, Lipid profile to ruled out Hypercholesterolemia
- MRI to ruled out Diffuse cerebral ischemia
MANAGEMENT OF NTG
Goal of treatment is to preserve the visual
FUNCTION
Non-Progressive form does not require any
treatment, as it rarely progresses. Monitoring
& follow up is required every 6-12 months.
Progressive form needs treatment. Target
should be to reduce 30% IOP from the initial, may
delay the progression.
NTG
- A GARDEN VARIETY OF POAG (30% out of 66%)
- MOST LIKELY GENETIC (OPTINEUON GENE)
- A BENIGN VARIETY OF POAG
- BUT DIFFICULT TO TREAT IOP TO BE REDUCED BY 30%
- BLINDNESS IS UNUSUAL IN NTG
- F>M 6:1
- PATIENTS ARE HYPOTENSIVE
- LOCALIZED VFD & FIXATION THREATENING
- Age must be above 45years & F/H
- IT IS EASY TO MAKE IOP 4OmmHG TO 20mmHG BUT TOUGH TO BRING IOP 16mmHG TO
14 mmHG
TREATMENT
- Avoid beta blockers; non selective Beta-blockers may decrease the perfusion pressure. But selective blockers like Betaxolol may increase OBF but at the same time it has less IOP lowering.
- Brimonidine (Alphagan)
- Calcium channel blocker of systemic use Nifedipine is benificial
- Prostaglandin
- ALT
- Surgery
PROGRESSION OF NTG
- Deepening of existing field defect
- Expansion of existing field defect
- Appearance of new defect
- Threat to fixation
|
|
PLAN OF TREATING LTG
-
VERY DIFFICULT TO TREAT AS WELL AS TO DIAGNOSE
-
FIRSTLY, TO REDUCE THE IOP BY 30%. HER IOP WAS 15
WE REDUCED HER IOP TO 15X.7=10.5MmmHg WITH AZOPT
-
IF HER IOP BECOMES BELOW 10 THERE IS NO NEED OF DOING Visual Field
-
THINK BEFORE USING BETA BLOCKER DROPS IN NTG
-
PHASING TO BE DONE
-
If medical treatment fails then ALT has to be tried, if it also fails go for Surgery
-
24 Hrs. MONITORING OF B.P. IF DIAS DIPS DOWN AT NIGHT BELOW 60 mmHG AND PT IS HYPERTENTSIVE AND IF HE/SHE IS ON BETA BLOCKER TYPE OF DRUGS THEN THAT SHOULD BE CHANGED.CONSULT WITH CARDIOLOGIST IOP/BP
-
Neuro protector Vit E. Aspirin, aerobic exercise, anti oxidant can be used to improve perfusion. TRY TO CORRECT HYPOTENSION.
-
What to do when there is High BP with Glaucoma? TOUGH QUESTION.?
-
Three U.S. President died of hypertension. Theodore Roosevelt,
Woodrow Wilson and Franklin Roosevelt, all died from
Complication from FLUCTUATION OF HYPERTENSION
| Latanoprost 0.005% (XALATAN) |
PHARMACIA |
| Travoprost 0.004% (TRAVATAN) |
ALCON |
| Bimatoprost 0.03% (LUMIGAN) |
ALLERGAN |
| Unoprostone 0.15% (RESCULA) |
NOVARTIS |
ANY FLUCTUATION IS BAD
|
|
|
HIGHER RISK OF PROGRESSION NTG
- IOP near the upper limit of normal
- Wider diurnal variation
- Deep localized notch of the disc
- New optic disc hemorrhage
- Systemic hypotension
- Young age
- Black race
- Myopia
- Vasopasam
- No history of hemodynamic crisis (Hemodynamic episode is associated with non-progressive form)
|
This young lady of 38 yrs.
came to us about 3 yrs back.
An established case of LTG
with hypotension, and diag.
a case of early presbyopic.
on routine Fundus exam.
|
|
Asymmetric C;D disc but ratio
are same 0.65.Rt.disc & NRR ok
Lt. disc shows Sup. temp. notching
which corresponds with the three
consecutive field. D/D retinal
hemorrhage. (Ruled out)
|
|
COMMON IN NTG

|
NTG PATIENT'S VF AND FUNDUS
Both the overviews show NTG R>L .Both Discs have V>H and Sup & Inf Notching are seen.
|
|
AN ESTABLISHED CASE
OF NTG.HER IOP IS NOW
10mmHg B/E
|
|
|
LAST PT'S 24 MONITORING OF BP
24 hrs. Monitoring of a LTG pt. done with mild hypertension. She is on
Atenolol 50mg in the morning Amlodipine 5mg at bed time. After she
has been diagnosed as NTG on Jan 02 and on Azopt thrice daily. During Night her diastole drops below 60.She has been advised to consult her cardiologist about her low diastole tendency at late Night.
|
|
COLOR DOPPLER SONOGRAPHY
HEALTHY............ .......GLAUCOMA
PATIENT
|
Color doppler, sonography,
is used on Glaucoma patients
to determine the blood
velocity in several vessels
leading to the eye. This
enables a calculation of
resistance index, a parameter
for downstream resistance
to flow that is of particular
Importance in glaucoma. Here
an ophthalmic artery
of a healthy individual and
the same test on Glaucoma pt.
with reduced perfusion is
shown.
|
|
|
OVER VIEW
 |
This middle aged man complains of frequent
Change of his reading glass. IOP normal. B/E.
V.A 6/6 B/E. With +78 deep cupping has been
noticed. B/E.ISNT rule is not ok. Rt. sup NRR
is thinner than nasal NRR. In Rt. Fundus both
Sup & inf. NFLD are seen which well correlates
with the VFD Sup & inf arcuate SCOTOMAS.
So, the second Rt. field is reliable and taken as base
line VF and an early case of NTG.
Lt. Fundus shows inf. temp. NFLD as well as inf.
notching, which well correlates with VF's Supra
Nasal arcuate SCOTOMA joins the upper nasal
step. Lt. temp. pallor of the disc well correlates
with the Upper Nasal step.
SO BOTH THE SECOND FIELDS ARE
RELIABLE & TAKEN AS A BASE LINE
FIELD AND WELL CORRELATES WITH
THE FUNDUS, A CASE OF EARLY NTG.

|
|
|
|
WHY 21 CONSIDERED “NORMAL”

THE IOP IS DISTRIBUTED IN THE NORMAL POPULATION IN A GAUSSIAN OR “BELL-SHAPED” MANNER |
DUANE'S CD-ROM 2003 EDITION
TARGET PRESSURE RANGES; Goal for lowering IOP
|
Intraocular Pressure
|
Damage Pressure
(mmHg)
|
Decrease Desired
(%)
|
Absolute level desired (mmHg)
|
Above 35
|
About 50%
|
18-25 |
25-35 |
About 40-50%
|
13-18 |
21-25 |
About 40%
|
14-16 |
17-20 |
About 40%-30%
|
12-15 |
13-16 |
About 20%
|
10-12 |
10-12 |
About 10%-20%
|
8-9 |
A target pressure will not damage the optic nerve any further.
|
TARGET IOP
| |
|
TARGET
|
|
IOP, Slight disc damage
|
17-18mmHg |
|
IOP, moderate disc damage |
15 mmHg |
|
IOP, Serious disc damage |
12 mmHg |
Slight damaged mean a change in the optic nerve ± small VFD
Dr. Rick Wilson
|
Establishing Initial Target IOP (CIGTS Study)
Target IOP = (1 - Reference IOP + Visual Field Score ) x Reference IOP 100
Example
|
MODE OF ACTION
. |
IOP Decrease
|
Decreases Aqueous Production
|
Increases Uveoscleral Outflow
|
Increases Trabecular Outflow
|
|
Brimonidine
|
20%-30%
|
|
|
. |
|
ß-Blockers
|
20%-30%
|
|
. |
. |
|
Pilocarpine
|
10%-20%
|
. |
. |
|
|
Dorzolamide
|
15%-20% |
|
. |
. |
|
Prostaglandin
|
25%-30%
|
. |
|
. |
|
|
DISEASE CAPSULE ; POAG
1. EPIDEMIOLOGY
- Major Risk Factors
- Advanced age
- Black race
- Positive F/H
- Elevated intraocular pressure
2. MINOR RISK FACTORS
3. SYMPTOMS
- Early; none
- Late; loss of peripheral vision
- Very late; loss of central vision
4.SIGNS
- Cornea.............................Normal
- Anterior Chamber............ Normal
- Iris................................... Normal
|
Angle & Trabecular Meshwork |
Normal |
Lens |
Normal |
Intra ocular pressure |
| | |